TexasResearch → Report #1

What Texas water districts owe

Joining the Bond Review Board's FY2025 debt data to TCEQ's district registry, district by district: $39.6 billion in principal outstanding across 1,365 water districts — $25.0 billion of it tax-supported, meaning property taxes inside those districts' boundaries service it.

The findings

  • $25.0 billion of the $39.6 billion is tax-supported debt — the kind the district's I&S tax rate exists to repay. The remainder is revenue-supported, concentrated in wholesale authorities (the largest, NORTH TEXAS MWD, owes $5,402,035,000 — nearly all revenue-backed, repaid by water sales, not property taxes).
  • 263 districts carry a verified zero — not "no data": the BRB's records show no principal outstanding for them at all.
  • The median MUD with a 2025 rate levies $0.7 per $100 of taxable value (965 MUDs carry a rate in the Comptroller's file), and 263 districts levy $1.00 or more.

The ten largest tax-supported debts

DistrictCountyTax-supported principal (FY2025)
HARRIS COUNTY FCD Harris $1,186,280,000
PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Harris $406,509,397
HARRIS COUNTY MUD 165 Harris $328,180,000
CEDAR PORT NAVIGATION AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Chambers $308,745,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 Chambers $308,745,000
VIRIDIAN MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tarrant $293,560,000
HIDALGO COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 Hidalgo $249,590,000
HARRIS COUNTY MUD 489 Harris $229,160,000
HORIZON REGIONAL MUD El Paso $221,009,985
HARRIS COUNTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18 Harris $213,515,000

Method and limits

Debt: Bond Review Board data center, per-issuer principal outstanding, fiscal year 2025 (Texas's fiscal year ends August 31); excludes obligations under one year and debt not requiring Attorney General approval, per the BRB's own scope. Rates: Comptroller Special District Rates and Levies 2025 (Tax Code §5.091), version "Working" — rates the appraisal district did not report are excluded, never counted as zero. Join: three-agency name normalization with ambiguity never resolved by guessing; 1,727 registry districts have no BRB record and are not in these totals — absence from the file, not proof of zero debt. The mirror is also true: BRB issuers that match no registry district (dissolved or renamed entities, mostly) are not counted, so the BRB's own statewide water-district total runs higher than the joined total reported here. Every district's page shows its figures and history.

Cite as: "The HOA Book, Texas water-district debt report, BRB FY2025 data pulled 2026-08-08." Wrong or missing? Tell us.